Alex here with this week’s Macro Musings.
As always, if you come across something cool during the week, shoot me an email at firstname.lastname@example.org and I’ll share it with the group.
Recent Articles/Videos —
JD.com Update — An update on where we think JD.com can go from here.
Red Teaming — A review of one of the most important analysis techniques we utilize at Macro Ops.
Articles I’m reading —
Sri Thiruvadanthai wrote a fantastic post on monetary policy feedback loops and instability. Anybody who has studied Soros knows that one of his primary market advantages was his understanding of reflexivity and feedback loops. This helped him gauge the stability and staying power of both real and Soros-style false trends. An invaluable skill as feedback loops are a constant in the market, as the Palindrome himself once noted:
At any moment of time there are myriads of feedback loops at work, some of which are positive, others negative. They interact with each other, producing the irregular price patterns that prevail most of the time; but on the rare occasions that bubbles develop to their full potential they tend to overshadow all other influences.
Thiruvadanthai does a great job of exploring the more important of these feedback loops, those of monetary policy origins. Here’s an excerpt.
However, in the real world, the expectations of financial market participants can diverge from the expectations of business executives making capital spending decisions. So, if financial market participants take a rosier view of the future, they can bid up asset prices, but, to the extent business capital spending decisions are driven less by cost of capital and more by demand, business executives may see limited opportunity for fixed investment. In that case, the economy may remain tepid, the Fed will remain accommodative, supporting the asset price speculation. Moreover, to the extent the real economy has considerable slack, the Fed has the freedom to address financial market turmoil, or the Fed Put is closer to the money. In some ways, this describes the situation of the past several years. On the other hand, if the real economy is booming and/or inflation is high, the Fed, driven by real economy considerations, may be constrained in its willingness to pay obeisance to every market hiccup. The Fed Put would be further out of the money.
It’s a quick and worthy read. Here’s the link.
Oh… and also check out this short but great interview with Druckenmiller from 1988. Here’s the link and h/t to @teddyvallee for the find.
Podcast I’m listening to —
This week I listened to a number of great podcasts. But the one that really blew me away was Patrick O’Shaughnessy’s talk with Boyd Varty on Invest Like the Best. Here’s the intro to their talk from Patrick’s website:
My guest is Boyd Varty, who grew up in the South African Bush, living among and tracking wild leopards. The main theme of our conversation is tracking, and how the same strategy for pursuing animals in the wild can be applied to all aspects of our lives. Boyd’s family has been tracking animals for four generations, and he is bringing what they have learned to a larger audience around the world.
This was an older talk that was reposted. I had skipped over it originally because in one of my previous jobs I had spent a considerable amount of time learning to track, from some of the best in the world. And so I wasn’t really interested in hearing more on the subject. At least until a number of you guys recommended it to me and so I finally got around to it and I’m so glad I did.
The talk has very little to do with actual tracking — although there’s some amazing stories about tracking in it. But Boyd really uses the concept of tracking to discuss the principles for living a good life. One that’s in accord with nature. My favorite bit was his idea of viewing “uncertainty as a discipline of aliveness”. Not only accepting the uncertainty of nature and life, but learning to harness that to one’s own advantage.
Anyways, if you haven’t already, I suggest you give it a listen. It’s that good. Here’s the link.
Book I’m reading —
This week I read an older trading book called How I Trade and Invest in Stocks and Bonds by Richard Wyckoff. The book was first published in 1922 and most of you should be familiar with the name of Wyckoff. He’s one of the original OG traders that came up in the heyday of speculation. Along with the likes of Keene, Livermore, and Baruch.
I can’t remember if I read this book years ago. I probably did. Either way, it’d been long enough to where this a fresh read. It’s a good book on the foundational principles of speculation. And I just personally, enjoy reading old investing books and this was a fun one.
Here are a few of his trading principles. They are as true today as they were then, nearly 100 years ago.
THE MAIN FACTOR IS THE TREND. If you work in harmony with the trend of the market, your chances for success are three or four times what they would be if you buck the trend. That is, if you buy in a bull market, the trend will, under ordinary circumstances, give you a profit; but if the trend of the market is downward, and you take a long position, the only way you can get out is on the incidental rally. This brief statement covers the point about as well as could be done in many chapters.
RISK SHOULD ALMOST INVARIABLY BE LIMITED. Not only the experience of those whose trading I have observed but my own experience proves that whenever one departs from this general principles he is inviting serious losses. The best way to limit your risk is to form a habit of placing two or three-point stops behind anytrade which is made for the purpose of deriving a profit from the fluctuations. Harriman contended three-eights of a point, or one point, was enough; but of course he was originally a trader on the floor of the Stock Exchange. The most successful traders have followed this rule and its importance cannot be overestimated.
ANTICIPATED PROFITS SHOULD BE AT LEAST THREE OR FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE RISK. It must be expected that a percentage of your transactions will show a loss. The trader should aim to have such large profits on his successful trades that the losses and other expenses will still leave him something to the good. Profits can often be protected by moving stop orders up or by selling one-half of the commitment in order to mark down the cost of the remaining half.
ONE SHOULD BE ABLE TO DEAL FREELY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE MARKET. Any one who is unable to do this had better become an investor instead of a trader, buying in panics or on big declines such securities as appear to be selling below their intrinsic value.
YOU SHOULD EITHER MAKE A BUSINESS OF TRADING OR ELSE NOT TRY TO BE A TRADER. You cannot be succesful at trading any more than you can be at mining, manufacturing, doctoring or anything else, unless you are trained for it. And by “training” I do not mean an occasional dab. Incidentally, unless you are peculiarly adapted to the business you had better become an intelligent investor instead of an unintelligent trader.
Chart(s) I’m looking at —
Trade I’m looking at —
So Starbucks (SBUX) has an interesting chart. The one below is a monthly.
The stock has been trading in a tight horizontal channel for nearly 3-years. Tight sideways action like this, over a long period, often precedes a big move.
I’m just starting to dig into the company but there’s some interesting things going on. For example, over the past 5 years, the company has increased its number of stores in China from 800 to 3,200 today. That’s an average of one new store every 15 hours…
It’s mobile payments app saw payments grow over 75% year-over-year in 17’.
China’s middle class (where Starbucks is seeing the majority of its growth) is expected to double over the next 5 years, from 300m to 600m, according to McKinsey. The Chinese are just developing their affinity for coffee and it looks like Starbucks may have an increasingly large runway in the company.
I’ve still got a lot of digging to do. The company has seen sales and cash flow growth stall out some over the last year. So I need to figure out why that is and if it’s likely to continue. But if there’s a play here, SBUX could be a good candidate for our DOTM call strategy.
Quote I’m pondering —
There are two kinds of disequilibrium: static disequilibrium, where both the prevailing dogma and the prevailing social conditions are rigidly fixed but quite far removed from each other; and dynamic disequilibrium, where both the real world and the participant’s views are changing so rapidly that they cannot help but be far apart. ~ George Soros
Understanding the prevailing beliefs of market participants about how they think the world works is almost as important as understanding how the world actually works.
Both drive decision making and thus price action…