THIS INFINITE GAME [February 14, 2026]

In a group of highly talented macro traders, I trade math. I screen for predictable, repeating price structures that offer asymmetric reward-to-risk. My setups frame a return four times my risk. I aim to turn over this edge as many times as possible.

One of Macro Ops’s favorite Market Wizards, Peter Brandt, also trades math—much better than me, I’ll add. He’s spoken openly about this focus being birthed out of the worst trading year and longest drawdown of his life.

I almost quit trading. Really close to it. I had enough money to call it quits for life. Through the help of fellow trader friends, I became obsessed with the math and probability behind trading. Trading became a mathematical challenge, not just a matter of finding a new trade.

Yet if Peter is obsessed with the numbers, why is he also adamant that human emotions are a trader’s biggest enemy? Shouldn’t that be a problem confined to discretionary traders?

Consider the foundational research of Kahneman and Tversky: losses are roughly twice as powerful psychologically as are gains. The reward-to-risk of my breakout setups may be 4:1. But the pleasure-to-pain ratio is 1:2.

So while the math says “great news!” After ten 1R losing trades and only three 4R winning trades, your account is up 2R in an adverse regime. The psychology says “not so fast!” Each of those 1R losses generated two units of pain. You’re running an eight-unit pleasure deficit.

Trading math looks one way: clean, elegant, rational. But it feels dramatically different. Which is why trading this way is simply intolerable without conscious inward investigation.

Peter’s Factor Report regularly opens with personal commentary. In the August 1, 2025 report, he wrote just two words: “Tough week!” In the next report: “Tough week!” And in the report after: “Tough week! AGAIN!

This continued for twenty weeks, evolving from “Tough week” to “Tough markets” to “Tough Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday.” When his Factor Service finally closed out 2025 and this four-month stretch ended, he shared his Rate of Return for the year: 70.7%.

Tough year!”

A Launching Pad in Energy

Dominion Energy has been on my watchlist since late last year. It fit every criteria I look for in my breakout setups: 1) a continuation pattern, 2) multiple months in duration, 3) directionally supported by a long-term trend filter, 4) with three or more reactions to a clearly defined price level.

Dominion Energy (D), 1D, January 2026

But there was something unique about this particular Rectangle Continuation pattern … Zooming out, this pattern formed the Handle of a much larger, 15-month Cup & Handle Continuation—which fit all of my breakout criteria in its own right:

Dominion Energy (D), 1D, January 2026

When a smaller pattern appears nested within a larger pattern, and completion of the smaller pattern would also trigger completion of the larger, that smaller pattern can be referred to as a “Launching Pattern.”

The smaller pattern “launches” the larger.

Such patterns are some of my absolute favorite setups.

Dominion Energy (D), 1D, January 2026

Last week, I featured Dominion Energy in the active watchlist section of This Infinite Game.

This week, a breakout of the six-month Rectangle Continuation “launched” completion of the 15-month Cup & Handle.

Our Macro Ops portfolio opened a risk-defined position.

Dominion Energy (D), 1W

Outcomes are unknowable.

But I’ll take this trade 10 out of 10 times it appears.

T-Notes on Deck

There is a strikingly similar setup to Dominion Energy in 2-Year Note Futures:

2-Year T-Note Futures, 1D

And 5-Year T-Note Futures may have already tipped their hand, breaking out of a five-month channel on Friday:

5-Year T-Note Futures, 1D

For an analog of how such channel breaks can play out, see Soybean Oil Futures:

Soybean Oil Futures, 1D

Meanwhile, the NASDAQ 100 Equal Weight ETF looks absolutely atrocious: breaking down a seven-month support level while below the 200EMA trend filter.

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF, QQEW, 1D

Tech stocks down, bonds up?                                                           

The Pauses That Refresh

As mentioned last week, the names on my active watchlist are narrowing. But there remain a number of high-quality setups pending breakout.

Long setups are currently tilted 2:1 defensive-to-cyclical, spanning financial services, healthcare and life sciences, and consumer and industrial distribution.

Here are the symbols that have my attention going into next week:

Brookfield Corporation (BN)

Celestica, Inc. (CLS)

National Vision Holdings (EYE)

Innovative Industrial Properties (IIPR)

OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW)

TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

XP Inc. (XP)

Ziff Davis (ZD)

Best wishes in your trading, and see you in the next issue.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Brandon Beylo

Value Investor

Brandon has been a professional investor focusing on value for over 13 years, spending his time in small to micro-cap companies, spin-offs, SPACs, and deep value liquidation situations. Over time, he’s developed a deeper understanding for what deep-value investing actually means, and refined his philosophy to include any business trading at a wild discount to what he thinks its worth in 3-5 years.

Brandon has a tenacious passion for investing, broad-based learning, and business. He previously worked for several leading investment firms before joining the team at Macro Ops. He lives by the famous Munger mantra of trying to get a little smarter each day.

AK

Investing & Personal Finance

AK is the founder of Macro Ops and the host of Fallible.

He started out in corporate economics for a Fortune 50 company before moving to a long/short equity investment firm.

With Macro Ops focused primarily on institutional clients, AK moved to servicing new investors just starting their journey. He takes the professional research and education produced at Macro Ops and breaks it down for beginners. The goal is to help clients find the best solution for their investing needs through effective education.

Tyler Kling

Volatility & Options Trader

Former trade desk manager at $100+ million family office where he oversaw multiple traders and helped develop cutting edge quantitative strategies in the derivatives market.

He worked as a consultant to the family office’s in-house fund of funds in the areas of portfolio manager evaluation and capital allocation.

Certified in Quantitative Finance from the Fitch Learning Center in London, England where he studied under famous quants such as Paul Wilmott.

Alex Barrow

Macro Trader

Founder and head macro trader at Macro Ops. Alex joined the US Marine Corps on his 18th birthday just one month after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. He subsequently spent a decade in the military. Serving in various capacities from scout sniper to interrogator and counterintelligence specialist. Following his military service, he worked as a contract intelligence professional for a number of US agencies (from the DIA to FBI) with a focus on counterintelligence and terrorist financing. He also spent time consulting for a tech company that specialized in building analytic software for finance and intelligence analysis.

After leaving the field of intelligence he went to work at a global macro hedge fund. He’s been professionally involved in markets since 2005, has consulted with a number of the leading names in the hedge fund space, and now manages his own family office while running Macro Ops. He’s published over 300 white papers on complex financial and macroeconomic topics, writes regularly about investment/market trends, and frequently speaks at conferences on trading and investing.

Macro Ops is a market research firm geared toward professional and experienced retail traders and investors. Macro Ops’ research has been featured in Forbes, Marketwatch, Business Insider, and Real Vision as well as a number of other leading publications.

You can find out more about Alex on his LinkedIn account here and also find him on Twitter where he frequently shares his market research.